News Heat Trend
Project Overview
Circuit is the next-gen DEX designed to serve as the liquidity hub for the Zircuit ecosystem. Circuit supports standard pool AMMs, stablecoin pool AMMs, and cutting-edge liquidity asset AMMs.
Eight Banking Trade Associations: CLARITY Act Circuit Breaker Is Not a Safeguard
Odaily News: According to crypto reporter Eleanor Terrett, eight banking trade groups have stated that the deposit outflow "circuit breaker" mechanism added to the new version of the CLARITY Act is not an effective safeguard, because the mechanism would only be triggered after large-scale deposit outflows have already occurred.In a letter to Senate leaders, these groups called for further tightening of provisions related to stablecoin rewards, in order to close loopholes that could allow stablecoin balances to earn interest-like payments.
Blockchain Association and CCI File for Injunction to Halt Illinois' 0.2% Digital Asset Transaction Tax
Odaily News – The Blockchain Association and the Innovative Crypto Council (CCI) have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction with the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois, seeking to halt the 0.2% digital asset franchise transaction tax scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, during the pendency of litigation. The tax applies to crypto entities established in Illinois or providing services to Illinois residents with annual gross revenues exceeding $100,000. The two lobbying groups had previously sued Illinois over the measure and, together with the Chamber of Digital Commerce, argue that the law violates the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act as well as the Due Process and Interstate Commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
Kalshi Says CFTC Will Rewrite Rules Within Weeks or Months, New Jersey Seeks Supreme Court Review of Sports Betting Regulatory Dispute
Odaily News According to Odaily, Prediction market platform Kalshi has not yet filed its response with the U.S. Supreme Court, with a 30-day deadline for its response to New Jersey's September 2 filing. New Jersey is asking the court to determine whether states can regulate sports betting offered on exchanges registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), as the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals are split on the issue.Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that the CFTC will issue new rules within the coming weeks or months to further clarify Rule 40.11. Kalshi's litigation lead Jovy Dedaj and spokesperson Dani Lever also noted that the Ninth Circuit's ruling was primarily based on regulatory provisions currently being rewritten.In June, the CFTC proposed replacing its blanket prohibition on betting contracts with case-by-case public interest reviews, under which sporting events would be classified as gambling, though most game outcomes and special wager contracts could still be permitted. After Kalshi submits its response, New Jersey will have 10 days to reply, and the Supreme Court typically schedules a conference to consider the case about a month thereafter. (Bitcoin.com News)
Michigan judge prohibits Kalshi from offering sports betting contracts locally, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations.
According to Decrypt, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina has issued a preliminary injunction against prediction market platform Kalshi, ordering it to stop offering sports betting-related contracts to Michigan residents. The court determined that Kalshi's relevant operations are essentially "sports betting disguised as investment opportunities."
New Jersey officials seek U.S. Supreme Court review of Kalshi sports event contracts case
Odaily News: New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and acting director of the state's Division of Gaming Enforcement, Mary Jo Flaherty, have filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting review of the state's enforcement action against prediction market platform Kalshi over its sports event contracts.The petition cites civil cases brought by at least 20 state gaming regulators and asks the Supreme Court to rule on whether prediction market companies may still violate state laws while complying with regulations set by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The petition also addresses whether the Dodd-Frank Act precludes state regulatory authority over sports betting within their jurisdictions.The filing challenges a 2-1 ruling issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in April. Kalshi spokesperson Dani Lever stated that the company disagrees with New Jersey's appeal to the Supreme Court, adding that Kalshi cannot operate under separate oversight from 50 regulators, and that the company remains confident in the lower court's ruling. (Cointelegraph)
The Ninth Circuit ruled that Kalshi sports event contracts are not swaps, New Jersey has until September 3 to seek Supreme Court review
Odaily News - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 3-0 on August 28 that sports event contracts offered by Kalshi are not swaps, and that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preclude Nevada from applying gambling regulations to the relevant contracts. The court also vacated a prior injunction that allowed Kalshi to continue offering the contracts, and denied injunction requests from Crypto.com and Robinhood.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled in April of this year that Kalshi's related contracts were likely swaps and protected by federal law from state regulation. The two federal appellate courts are now split on the issue, and New Jersey has a September 3 deadline to petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review.Kalshi said it will seek further review and believes current U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) rules do not prohibit sports event contracts. Robinhood said it plans to appeal; the CFTC, meanwhile, noted that derivatives structured as swaps qualify as swaps, and except for onions and movie box office revenue, the law provides no related exemptions. (Bitcoin.com News)
Eight Banking Trade Associations: CLARITY Act Circuit Breaker Is Not a Safeguard
Odaily News: According to crypto reporter Eleanor Terrett, eight banking trade groups have stated that the deposit outflow "circuit breaker" mechanism added to the new version of the CLARITY Act is not an effective safeguard, because the mechanism would only be triggered after large-scale deposit outflows have already occurred.In a letter to Senate leaders, these groups called for further tightening of provisions related to stablecoin rewards, in order to close loopholes that could allow stablecoin balances to earn interest-like payments.
Andre Cronje: DeFi Is No Longer Decentralized, Industry Divided Over Security Path Centered on "Circuit Breakers"
Andre Cronje stated most current decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols no longer qualify as "DeFi in the strict sense" and are closer to commercial systems operated by teams. This has sparked industry division over whether "circuit breakers" should be introduced to mitigate attack risks.In an interview, Andre Cronje pointed out that early DeFi centered on immutable smart contracts, but today many protocols rely on upgradeable contracts, multi-signature permissions, off-chain infrastructure, and manual operational processes. In essence, they have transitioned from "immutable public goods" to "operable, for-profit businesses." He noted that against the backdrop of recent security incidents, including DeFi attacks involving approximately $280 million and $293 million, industry risks have expanded from simple smart contract vulnerabilities to "Web2-style risks" such as infrastructure issues, permission controls, and social engineering attacks.Regarding risk management, Cronje's firm Flying Tulip recently introduced circuit breakers that delay or queue withdrawals during abnormal fund outflows, providing an emergency response window of about six hours to prevent systemic bank runs and further losses.However, this mechanism has also sparked controversy. Michael Egorov believes that circuit breakers may introduce new centralized attack surfaces. If controlled by signers or administrators, they could instead become new security vulnerabilities or sources of freezing risk. He emphasized that DeFi design should minimize human intervention rather than increase manual control points. Industry analysts pointed out that this debate essentially reflects how DeFi is shifting from the ideal model of "code is law" toward a practical architecture of "hybrid governance plus operational control," while the security boundaries are being redefined. (Cointelegraph)
Michigan judge prohibits Kalshi from offering sports betting contracts locally, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations.
According to Decrypt, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina has issued a preliminary injunction against prediction market platform Kalshi, ordering it to stop offering sports betting-related contracts to Michigan residents. The court determined that Kalshi's relevant operations are essentially "sports betting disguised as investment opportunities."
Blockchain Association Supports Custodia Bank's Application to Supreme Court for Federal Reserve Master Account Access
According to The Block, the Blockchain Association filed an amicus curiae brief on August 13 supporting Custodia Bank's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting a review of the legality of the Federal Reserve Bank's refusal of its master account application. The Blockchain Association pointed out that this case concerns whether legitimate digital asset enterprises can compete in a fair environment, and warned that the lower court ruling provides a precedent for federal regulators "to debank unpopular industries in the future without the intervention of state regulators." Custodia Bank was founded by Wall Street veteran Caitlin Long, applied for a Fed master account in October 2020, was rejected by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in January 2023 on the grounds that the crypto business model posed risks, subsequently lost twice in the district court and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, and was denied rehearing by the full court in a 7 to 3 vote in March 2026. The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City must respond to the Supreme Court application by September 11.
U.S. Appeals Court Upholds SBF's Conviction, 25-Year Sentence, and $11 Billion Forfeiture Order
Odaily News: The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has issued a formal order upholding the conviction and sentencing of former FTX CEO Sam "SBF" Bankman-Fried. The lower court previously found him guilty on seven felony counts and sentenced him to 25 years in federal prison. The three-judge panel rejected Bankman-Fried's appeal arguments that FTX had sufficient liquidity and that investors would be fully repaid without incurring losses, and upheld the $11 billion forfeiture order issued by the New York court in the criminal case. Circuit Judge Barrington D. Parker stated in the opinion that even if Bankman-Fried believed he would ultimately repay customers, it does not affect the applicability of wire fraud laws to the temporary misappropriation of funds or property. With the order now in effect, his legal avenues for seeking early release have narrowed, including options such as applying for a presidential pardon or appealing to the Supreme Court.
Kalshi's federal protection claims dismissed by federal judge in Utah anti-gambling law lawsuit
: U.S. Federal District Judge Robert J. Shelby ruled that the Commodity Exchange Act does not prevent Utah from applying its anti-gambling laws to Kalshi's sports event contracts, granting Utah's motion for summary judgment and denying Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction. Shelby stated that the jurisdictional provisions of the Commodity Exchange Act are subject to multiple reasonable interpretations, and in such cases, courts generally do not support federal law preemption. He also rejected Kalshi's argument that amendments under the Dodd-Frank Act established federal preemption for derivatives trading. Kalshi spokesperson Jacki McGavick said the company disagrees with the ruling and will appeal to the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Currently, Utah users can still use sports event contracts, and the state has not yet initiated enforcement action. The New York Attorney General has already cited the ruling as supplementary grounds in opposing the CFTC's motion for a preliminary injunction against New York state. Earlier, New York sued Kalshi last week, alleging that it operates as an unlicensed gambling operator.
Custodia files petition with US Supreme Court, advancing 6-year dispute over Federal Reserve master account
Odaily Odaily News: Custodia Bank has filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking a ruling on whether a regional Federal Reserve Bank president has the authority to deny master account services to an institution. Custodia Bank had repeatedly applied for a Federal Reserve master account but was denied in 2023 by the Fed, citing significant safety and soundness risks associated with its novel business model and its planned primary focus on crypto assets. Custodia Bank subsequently appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, which ruled in favor of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City in 2024. The U.S. Supreme Court is expected to decide in October whether to take up the case. (Bitcoin.com News).
Lu Jun's court hearing has remained undecided for over six months, second supplementary indictment reveals 12.18 million yuan in bribes including Bitcoin benefits
Lu Jun, former deputy president of the Shanghai branch of China Development Bank, vice president of CDB Capital, and later head of the National Integrated Circuit Industry Investment Fund, is accused of accepting bribes totaling over 700 million yuan. In a second supplementary indictment by the Baishan City People's Procuratorate, it was disclosed that Lu Jun and his long-time colleague Du Yang received "benefits" of 12.18 million yuan, including equity consideration from Zhongqing Xinxin and Bitcoin. The involved Bitcoin is said to have been obtained through Du Yang's cooperative mining activities. Lu Jun's defense lawyer stated that Lu Jun was unaware of the Bitcoin mining activities. The case was adjourned by the presiding judge on November 28, 2025. To date, more than six months have passed since the trial began, and the case has not yet been decided. (Caixin)
Related news
Eight Banking Trade Associations: CLARITY Act Circuit Breaker Is Not a Safeguard
Odaily News: According to crypto reporter Eleanor Terrett, eight banking trade groups have stated that the deposit outflow "circuit breaker" mechanism added to the new version of the CLARITY Act is not an effective safeguard, because the mechanism would only be triggered after large-scale deposit outflows have already occurred.In a letter to Senate leaders, these groups called for further tightening of provisions related to stablecoin rewards, in order to close loopholes that could allow stablecoin balances to earn interest-like payments.
Blockchain Association and CCI File for Injunction to Halt Illinois' 0.2% Digital Asset Transaction Tax
Odaily News – The Blockchain Association and the Innovative Crypto Council (CCI) have filed a motion for a preliminary injunction with the Circuit Court of Sangamon County, Illinois, seeking to halt the 0.2% digital asset franchise transaction tax scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, during the pendency of litigation. The tax applies to crypto entities established in Illinois or providing services to Illinois residents with annual gross revenues exceeding $100,000. The two lobbying groups had previously sued Illinois over the measure and, together with the Chamber of Digital Commerce, argue that the law violates the federal Internet Tax Freedom Act as well as the Due Process and Interstate Commerce clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
Kalshi Says CFTC Will Rewrite Rules Within Weeks or Months, New Jersey Seeks Supreme Court Review of Sports Betting Regulatory Dispute
Odaily News According to Odaily, Prediction market platform Kalshi has not yet filed its response with the U.S. Supreme Court, with a 30-day deadline for its response to New Jersey's September 2 filing. New Jersey is asking the court to determine whether states can regulate sports betting offered on exchanges registered with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), as the Third Circuit Court of Appeals and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals are split on the issue.Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour stated that the CFTC will issue new rules within the coming weeks or months to further clarify Rule 40.11. Kalshi's litigation lead Jovy Dedaj and spokesperson Dani Lever also noted that the Ninth Circuit's ruling was primarily based on regulatory provisions currently being rewritten.In June, the CFTC proposed replacing its blanket prohibition on betting contracts with case-by-case public interest reviews, under which sporting events would be classified as gambling, though most game outcomes and special wager contracts could still be permitted. After Kalshi submits its response, New Jersey will have 10 days to reply, and the Supreme Court typically schedules a conference to consider the case about a month thereafter. (Bitcoin.com News)
Michigan judge prohibits Kalshi from offering sports betting contracts locally, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations.
According to Decrypt, Ingham County Circuit Court Judge Rosemarie Aquilina has issued a preliminary injunction against prediction market platform Kalshi, ordering it to stop offering sports betting-related contracts to Michigan residents. The court determined that Kalshi's relevant operations are essentially "sports betting disguised as investment opportunities."
New Jersey officials seek U.S. Supreme Court review of Kalshi sports event contracts case
Odaily News: New Jersey Attorney General Jennifer Davenport and acting director of the state's Division of Gaming Enforcement, Mary Jo Flaherty, have filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting review of the state's enforcement action against prediction market platform Kalshi over its sports event contracts.The petition cites civil cases brought by at least 20 state gaming regulators and asks the Supreme Court to rule on whether prediction market companies may still violate state laws while complying with regulations set by the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). The petition also addresses whether the Dodd-Frank Act precludes state regulatory authority over sports betting within their jurisdictions.The filing challenges a 2-1 ruling issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit in April. Kalshi spokesperson Dani Lever stated that the company disagrees with New Jersey's appeal to the Supreme Court, adding that Kalshi cannot operate under separate oversight from 50 regulators, and that the company remains confident in the lower court's ruling. (Cointelegraph)
The Ninth Circuit ruled that Kalshi sports event contracts are not swaps, New Jersey has until September 3 to seek Supreme Court review
Odaily News - The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit ruled 3-0 on August 28 that sports event contracts offered by Kalshi are not swaps, and that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preclude Nevada from applying gambling regulations to the relevant contracts. The court also vacated a prior injunction that allowed Kalshi to continue offering the contracts, and denied injunction requests from Crypto.com and Robinhood.The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit ruled in April of this year that Kalshi's related contracts were likely swaps and protected by federal law from state regulation. The two federal appellate courts are now split on the issue, and New Jersey has a September 3 deadline to petition the U.S. Supreme Court for review.Kalshi said it will seek further review and believes current U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) rules do not prohibit sports event contracts. Robinhood said it plans to appeal; the CFTC, meanwhile, noted that derivatives structured as swaps qualify as swaps, and except for onions and movie box office revenue, the law provides no related exemptions. (Bitcoin.com News)