News linked to both this project and an event.
Odaily reports, according to Lookonchain monitoring, after Ansem (@blknoiz06) spent 1500 SOL (worth $115,000) to buy PUMP, trader 0xbf73 opened a 10x long position on 764 million PUMP, worth $1.53 million. The liquidation price is $0.0016194.
Ansem posted on platform X, stating that he purchased PUMP tokens at around $0.001675. Ansem noted that pump.fun still generates approximately $30 to $40 million in monthly revenue during the bear market, and believes Solana could once again become a key platform for retail trading activity in this cycle. He further stated that if pump.fun stimulates the meme coin trading ecosystem through an airdrop, with the airdrop scale exceeding $300 million, market trading volume, attention, and activity could see an increase. Additionally, Ansem mentioned that if the price breaks below the low point during the unlock selling period of approximately $0.0014, this investment thesis would be invalidated.
Odaily News Renowned trader Ansem posted on X, stating that buybacks (for token prices) actually don’t have much effect.Ansem further noted that Hyperliquid's annualized revenue is $800 million, while Pump.fun's annualized revenue is $440 million; however, HYPE's FDV is as high as $65 billion, whereas PUMP's FDV is only $1.4 billion. Both teams regularly use a portion of their business profits for buybacks, yet their P/S ratios are vastly different.This disparity doesn't stem from how much revenue the businesses actually generate, but rather reflects the market's "trust premium" for the teams — a trust determined by their actions and decisions in the market. Hyperliquid never over-promises, focuses purely on product delivery, and generously rewards core users who contribute the most to the platform based on established metrics. In contrast, Pump.fun generated $1 billion in revenue, raised another $1 billion in an ICO, and promised users an airdrop, but has yet to deliver. Despite being one of the most successful and profitable businesses in the crypto industry, they lack a social consensus bond with their core user base and thus cannot achieve the trust premium that Hyperliquid enjoys.Therefore, what determines a business's valuation includes not only the "tangible value" derived purely from revenue and other metrics but also "intangible value." Trust, memetics, and attention are all crucial in the market, yet they are currently discussed far too little.
Odaily Odaily reports, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a trader who had accumulated losses of $4.89 million has once again opened a long position of 84 BTC, valued at $5.43 million, with 40x leverage. The trader also holds long positions of $290,000 in HYPE and $148,000 in PUMP. The account has also placed a limit order to buy 6.56 BTC, valued at $424,000, at a price of $64,600.
Odaily Odaily News According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, starting today, the one-year lock-up period for Pump.fun team and investor tokens has ended, entering a three-year unlock cycle. Early this morning, the first token unlock for Pump.fun team and investors occurred, with 57.279 billion PUMP unlocked and transferred to 121 wallets, valued at $86.49 million. Among them, the address GsM3...u6ya saw 52.039 billion PUMP unlocked and transferred, worth $78.58 million; the address ESRc...ZM67 saw 5.24 billion PUMP unlocked and transferred, worth $7.91 million.
According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin (@EmberCN), Pump.fun transferred another 16.43 million USDT to Kraken 7 hours ago. Thus, among the stablecoins (USDC+USDT) obtained from its $PUMP public offering last July, a cumulative total of approximately $770 million has flowed into centralized exchanges. Additionally, Pump.fun recently resumed selling operations of fee revenue, having transferred 342,500 SOL (approximately $27.59 million) in fee revenue to Kraken since mid-May.
According to Lookonchain monitoring, a whale began buying PUMP after more than a year of inactivity, spending 5,000 SOL (worth $358,000) to purchase 242.66 million PUMP tokens. Over a year ago, the whale bought 10,957 SOL at $237 each, worth $2.6 million, and staked them. Despite receiving 1,206 SOL in staking rewards, the position is still suffering a loss of over $1.7 million, a decline of 66%, due to the price drop.
according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a whale deposited 742.3 million PUMP tokens, worth $1.59 million, into Binance after 5 months; the wallet still holds 3.48 billion PUMP tokens, valued at $7.36 million.
据 Lookonchain 监测，某巨鲸做多多个热门山寨币，包括 NEAR、STRK、XMR、TON、AZTEC、PUMP。当前持仓包括：308 万枚 NEAR（483 万美元）、7555 万枚 STRK（430 万美元）、9561 枚 XMR（380 万美元）、128 万枚 TON（333 万美元）、1486 万枚 AZTEC（35.7 万美元）、7199 万枚 PUMP（14.7 万美元）。
Castle Labs (@castle_labs) published a post stating that the current crypto market is undergoing a profound paradigm shift—speculative models prioritizing extraction are gradually giving way to investment logic oriented toward revenue generation. The article notes that since 2026, the broader crypto market has performed poorly: most assets have seen sustained price declines, ETF funds have continued flowing out, project shutdowns have intensified, and institutional VC investments have grown increasingly conservative. The key catalysts for this shift were last October’s large-scale liquidation event and the ongoing market reflection triggered by gold consistently outperforming Bitcoin. On the revenue data front, among the roughly 5,700 protocols tracked by DeFiLlama, only 3.5% generated over $100,000 in revenue over the past 30 days—and fewer than 1% actually distributed earnings to token holders. The article focuses on top revenue-generating protocols—including Hyperliquid (HYPE), Pumpdotfun (PUMP), Tron (TRON), Sky (SKY), Jupiter (JUP), Aave (AAVE), and Aerodrome (AERO)—analyzing their price-to-sales ratios (P/S) and token holder return metrics. It argues that protocol revenue—and its capacity to feed value back to token holders—is becoming the core metric investors use to evaluate and select projects. Regarding institutionalization trends, traditional financial giants—including NYSE, Robinhood, BlackRock, and Franklin Templeton—