PumpBTC serves as a Liquid Staking Solution for Babylon. PumpBTC aims to help BTC holders maximize yields through Babylon's staking - essentially rebuilding $WBTC/$BTCB/$FBTC with native yield.
Odaily News Renowned trader Ansem posted on X, stating that buybacks (for token prices) actually don’t have much effect.Ansem further noted that Hyperliquid's annualized revenue is $800 million, while Pump.fun's annualized revenue is $440 million; however, HYPE's FDV is as high as $65 billion, whereas PUMP's FDV is only $1.4 billion. Both teams regularly use a portion of their business profits for buybacks, yet their P/S ratios are vastly different.This disparity doesn't stem from how much revenue the businesses actually generate, but rather reflects the market's "trust premium" for the teams — a trust determined by their actions and decisions in the market. Hyperliquid never over-promises, focuses purely on product delivery, and generously rewards core users who contribute the most to the platform based on established metrics. In contrast, Pump.fun generated $1 billion in revenue, raised another $1 billion in an ICO, and promised users an airdrop, but has yet to deliver. Despite being one of the most successful and profitable businesses in the crypto industry, they lack a social consensus bond with their core user base and thus cannot achieve the trust premium that Hyperliquid enjoys.Therefore, what determines a business's valuation includes not only the "tangible value" derived purely from revenue and other metrics but also "intangible value." Trust, memetics, and attention are all crucial in the market, yet they are currently discussed far too little.
According to an official announcement by Pump.fun, the platform has completed the burning of all previously repurchased $PUMP tokens, amounting to approximately $370 million—roughly 36% of the circulating supply. The burn was executed via two on-chain transactions at 20:52 UTC. Simultaneously, Pump.fun has launched a programmable buyback-and-burn mechanism, allocating 50% of its net revenue over the next year toward publicly purchasing $PUMP on the open market and immediately burning 100% of the acquired tokens. This mechanism is enforced via an immutable smart contract covering revenue streams from Pump.fun’s three core product lines: the bonding curve, PumpSwap, and Terminal. Its execution comprises four steps: fee collection, aggregation into an intermediate wallet, buyback, and burn—all of which can be tracked in real time at fees.pump.fun. The remaining 50% of revenue will fund operational expenses and ecosystem development, including team expansion, strategic investments, and marketing initiatives. Pump.fun stated that this move aims to address community concerns regarding the token’s long-term value and the transparency of the buyback mechanism, with the overarching goal of continuously reducing the circulating supply.
Odaily reports, according to Lookonchain monitoring, after Ansem (@blknoiz06) spent 1500 SOL (worth $115,000) to buy PUMP, trader 0xbf73 opened a 10x long position on 764 million PUMP, worth $1.53 million. The liquidation price is $0.0016194.
Ansem posted on platform X, stating that he purchased PUMP tokens at around $0.001675. Ansem noted that pump.fun still generates approximately $30 to $40 million in monthly revenue during the bear market, and believes Solana could once again become a key platform for retail trading activity in this cycle. He further stated that if pump.fun stimulates the meme coin trading ecosystem through an airdrop, with the airdrop scale exceeding $300 million, market trading volume, attention, and activity could see an increase. Additionally, Ansem mentioned that if the price breaks below the low point during the unlock selling period of approximately $0.0014, this investment thesis would be invalidated.
Odaily News Renowned trader Ansem posted on X, stating that buybacks (for token prices) actually don’t have much effect.Ansem further noted that Hyperliquid's annualized revenue is $800 million, while Pump.fun's annualized revenue is $440 million; however, HYPE's FDV is as high as $65 billion, whereas PUMP's FDV is only $1.4 billion. Both teams regularly use a portion of their business profits for buybacks, yet their P/S ratios are vastly different.This disparity doesn't stem from how much revenue the businesses actually generate, but rather reflects the market's "trust premium" for the teams — a trust determined by their actions and decisions in the market. Hyperliquid never over-promises, focuses purely on product delivery, and generously rewards core users who contribute the most to the platform based on established metrics. In contrast, Pump.fun generated $1 billion in revenue, raised another $1 billion in an ICO, and promised users an airdrop, but has yet to deliver. Despite being one of the most successful and profitable businesses in the crypto industry, they lack a social consensus bond with their core user base and thus cannot achieve the trust premium that Hyperliquid enjoys.Therefore, what determines a business's valuation includes not only the "tangible value" derived purely from revenue and other metrics but also "intangible value." Trust, memetics, and attention are all crucial in the market, yet they are currently discussed far too little.
Odaily Odaily reports, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a trader who had accumulated losses of $4.89 million has once again opened a long position of 84 BTC, valued at $5.43 million, with 40x leverage. The trader also holds long positions of $290,000 in HYPE and $148,000 in PUMP. The account has also placed a limit order to buy 6.56 BTC, valued at $424,000, at a price of $64,600.
Odaily Odaily News According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin's monitoring, starting today, the one-year lock-up period for Pump.fun team and investor tokens has ended, entering a three-year unlock cycle. Early this morning, the first token unlock for Pump.fun team and investors occurred, with 57.279 billion PUMP unlocked and transferred to 121 wallets, valued at $86.49 million. Among them, the address GsM3...u6ya saw 52.039 billion PUMP unlocked and transferred, worth $78.58 million; the address ESRc...ZM67 saw 5.24 billion PUMP unlocked and transferred, worth $7.91 million.
According to on-chain analyst Yu Jin (@EmberCN), Pump.fun transferred another 16.43 million USDT to Kraken 7 hours ago. Thus, among the stablecoins (USDC+USDT) obtained from its $PUMP public offering last July, a cumulative total of approximately $770 million has flowed into centralized exchanges. Additionally, Pump.fun recently resumed selling operations of fee revenue, having transferred 342,500 SOL (approximately $27.59 million) in fee revenue to Kraken since mid-May.
Odaily Odaily News, according to an official announcement, Binance will update the collateral rate and tiered collateral rate for Portfolio Margin and PMPro at 2026-07-24 06:00 UTC (14:00 Beijing time). The affected assets include ALGO, PUMP, WLD, JTO, TRUMP, etc. In addition, Binance Futures will adjust the leverage and margin tiers for several USDⓈ-M perpetual contracts at 06:30 UTC (14:30 Beijing time) on the same day. The contracts include C98USDT, CHRUSDT, LQTYUSDT, NILUSDT, USUALUSDT, SPELLUSDT, ONEUSDT, AEVOUSDT, CGPTUSDT, BANKUSDT, GUNUSDT, LAUSDT, OPNUSDT, KATUSDT, STARUSDT, and ZILUSDT. The announcement reminds users that changes in collateral rates may affect the Unified Maintenance Margin Ratio (uniMMR) and could lead to a risk of position liquidation.
Odaily Planet Daily reported that Pump.fun will launch a new token USDC pairing feature on May 21, and existing SOL-based pairings will not be affected by this change. Since its launch in January 2024, it is estimated that at least 5.07 million SOL has been locked in liquidity pools, valued at $430 million.According to on-chain data, over $382 million has been allocated for PUMP buybacks, removing 37.9% of the circulating supply from the market and offsetting 13.4% of the total supply. (solanafloor)
According to an official announcement by Pump.fun, the platform has completed the burning of all previously repurchased $PUMP tokens, amounting to approximately $370 million—roughly 36% of the circulating supply. The burn was executed via two on-chain transactions at 20:52 UTC. Simultaneously, Pump.fun has launched a programmable buyback-and-burn mechanism, allocating 50% of its net revenue over the next year toward publicly purchasing $PUMP on the open market and immediately burning 100% of the acquired tokens. This mechanism is enforced via an immutable smart contract covering revenue streams from Pump.fun’s three core product lines: the bonding curve, PumpSwap, and Terminal. Its execution comprises four steps: fee collection, aggregation into an intermediate wallet, buyback, and burn—all of which can be tracked in real time at fees.pump.fun. The remaining 50% of revenue will fund operational expenses and ecosystem development, including team expansion, strategic investments, and marketing initiatives. Pump.fun stated that this move aims to address community concerns regarding the token’s long-term value and the transparency of the buyback mechanism, with the overarching goal of continuously reducing the circulating supply.
According to Sandmark, Pump.fun is alleged to have conducted two rounds of layoffs prior to token unlocking. Documents and recordings show that the first round of layoffs occurred in early April, prior to the token unlocking time originally scheduled to begin in June for relevant employees, meaning at least one former employee may have thereby lost PUMP token allocations worth up to seven figures in USD at current prices. Co-founder Noah Tweedale stated in an internal meeting that the reason for the layoffs was that the company "expanded too fast".
Odaily Odaily News, according to an official announcement, Binance will update the collateral rate and tiered collateral rate for Portfolio Margin and PMPro at 2026-07-24 06:00 UTC (14:00 Beijing time). The affected assets include ALGO, PUMP, WLD, JTO, TRUMP, etc. In addition, Binance Futures will adjust the leverage and margin tiers for several USDⓈ-M perpetual contracts at 06:30 UTC (14:30 Beijing time) on the same day. The contracts include C98USDT, CHRUSDT, LQTYUSDT, NILUSDT, USUALUSDT, SPELLUSDT, ONEUSDT, AEVOUSDT, CGPTUSDT, BANKUSDT, GUNUSDT, LAUSDT, OPNUSDT, KATUSDT, STARUSDT, and ZILUSDT. The announcement reminds users that changes in collateral rates may affect the Unified Maintenance Margin Ratio (uniMMR) and could lead to a risk of position liquidation.
Odaily reports, according to Lookonchain monitoring, after Ansem (@blknoiz06) spent 1500 SOL (worth $115,000) to buy PUMP, trader 0xbf73 opened a 10x long position on 764 million PUMP, worth $1.53 million. The liquidation price is $0.0016194.
Ansem posted on platform X, stating that he purchased PUMP tokens at around $0.001675. Ansem noted that pump.fun still generates approximately $30 to $40 million in monthly revenue during the bear market, and believes Solana could once again become a key platform for retail trading activity in this cycle. He further stated that if pump.fun stimulates the meme coin trading ecosystem through an airdrop, with the airdrop scale exceeding $300 million, market trading volume, attention, and activity could see an increase. Additionally, Ansem mentioned that if the price breaks below the low point during the unlock selling period of approximately $0.0014, this investment thesis would be invalidated.
Odaily News Renowned trader Ansem posted on X, stating that buybacks (for token prices) actually don’t have much effect.Ansem further noted that Hyperliquid's annualized revenue is $800 million, while Pump.fun's annualized revenue is $440 million; however, HYPE's FDV is as high as $65 billion, whereas PUMP's FDV is only $1.4 billion. Both teams regularly use a portion of their business profits for buybacks, yet their P/S ratios are vastly different.This disparity doesn't stem from how much revenue the businesses actually generate, but rather reflects the market's "trust premium" for the teams — a trust determined by their actions and decisions in the market. Hyperliquid never over-promises, focuses purely on product delivery, and generously rewards core users who contribute the most to the platform based on established metrics. In contrast, Pump.fun generated $1 billion in revenue, raised another $1 billion in an ICO, and promised users an airdrop, but has yet to deliver. Despite being one of the most successful and profitable businesses in the crypto industry, they lack a social consensus bond with their core user base and thus cannot achieve the trust premium that Hyperliquid enjoys.Therefore, what determines a business's valuation includes not only the "tangible value" derived purely from revenue and other metrics but also "intangible value." Trust, memetics, and attention are all crucial in the market, yet they are currently discussed far too little.
Odaily Odaily reports, according to Onchain Lens monitoring, a trader who had accumulated losses of $4.89 million has once again opened a long position of 84 BTC, valued at $5.43 million, with 40x leverage. The trader also holds long positions of $290,000 in HYPE and $148,000 in PUMP. The account has also placed a limit order to buy 6.56 BTC, valued at $424,000, at a price of $64,600.