Latest developments in the case “Attempting to assert legal ownership over Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin”: Lawyers request avoidance of a unilateral judgment; long-term non-transfer of BTC from an address does not equate to loss or abandonment.
Source：
x.com
Alex Thorn analyzed that the case is still ongoing. If a default judgment is issued, it could have far-reaching implications for the legal definition of self-custodied Bitcoin assets and spark a long-standing debate over whether “dormant addresses” equate to ownerless assets.
