Noah is a stablecoin payment platform that provides global payment solutions. It has enterprise-level compliance and real-time settlement capabilities, reflecting the decentralization and efficiency of blockchain.
Galaxy 研究主管 Alex Thorn在 X 平台发文披露,围绕“Noah Doe”试图通过法律程序获得中本聪比特币所有权的遗弃比特币案件迎来重大进展,比特币政策研究所(BPI)已正式申请作为被告介入此案并寻求推动法院驳回全部诉讼。据悉,由律师事务所 White & Case 代理的 BPI 此次不仅申请介入案件,还提交了拟答辩文件、15 项积极抗辩理由并计划提出撤诉动议。 Alex Thorn 透露,BPI 称其具备介入资格,因为该机构长期自托管一部分计划无限期持有的比特币储备,而原告所主张的“长期未动用即构成遗弃”的理论,恰恰可能将类似资产纳入未来诉讼范围。如果本案的法律逻辑最终获得法院支持,未来可能成为剥夺长期自托管用户资产所有权的先例,所以这场诉讼不仅关乎中本聪相关资产,也关系到整个比特币自托管生态的法律基础。
According to Drift’s official announcement, the Drift Protocol released its latest recovery update on June 3, 2026. An independent forensic investigation conducted by cybersecurity firm Mandiant has confirmed that the prior attack against Drift was carried out by the North Korean threat group UNC6862, whose tactics closely align with those historically employed by North Korean state-sponsored hacking operations. On the rebuilding front, Drift announced the appointment of Noah Prince—former Engineering Lead of the Helium Protocol—as Protocol Lead, who will spearhead codebase hardening and platform security architecture redesign. Additionally, former members of the Gauntlet team have been brought on board to conduct margin engine reviews, optimize funding rates and market parameters, enhance liquidation mechanisms, and implement continuous risk monitoring. Drift plans to relaunch with “security-first” as its core principle, repositioning itself as Solana’s largest USDT-perpetuals exchange. With support from strategic partners including Tether, Drift will establish a dedicated recovery pool funded by platform revenues to compensate users for losses. Further details regarding the recovery mechanism and timeline will be disclosed progressively.
Galaxy stated in March this year, the New York State Supreme Court quietly accepted a lawsuit seeking to confirm the ownership of over 3.7 million Bitcoin (worth approximately $274 billion) associated with 39,069 Bitcoin addresses. This includes addresses belonging to Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto (a total of 21,744 addresses holding 1.09 million Bitcoin, valued at $83.7 billion at current prices).The plaintiff is Noah Doe (a pseudonym) and two unnamed Wyoming limited liability companies. Noah Doe requests the New York State Supreme Court to declare, via a declaratory judgment action (New York Civil Practice Law and Rules Section 3001) under the New York State Abandoned Property Law (Personal Property Law Article 7-B), that they possess ownership of these dormant addresses.In short, they seek a ruling from a New York court that the Bitcoin belonging to founder Satoshi Nakamoto (along with many other lost Bitcoin addresses) constitutes abandoned property. They argue they are entitled to legal ownership by virtue of "finding" these cryptocurrencies. From June 30 to July 10, 2025, they sent "disclaimer notices" to each found address via OP_RETURN.However, even if they win the case entirely, they will ultimately only obtain a court declaration. They will not receive any private keys, nor will they be able to transfer any Bitcoin from these addresses. But Galaxy states that the true value of the New York ruling lies in its ability to act as a "cloud on title." If these Bitcoins ever appear on any regulated platform, plaintiff Noah Doe could use this document to file a claim with an exchange or custodian.
New York Supreme Court Judge Kathy J. King has signed an order to pause proceedings in a lawsuit seeking ownership claims over 39,069 dormant bitcoin wallets, and has scheduled a hearing for July 14 regarding a key amicus curiae brief.The plaintiffs in the case are an anonymous individual referred to as "Noah Doe" and two shell companies, who are seeking to claim ownership of these wallets under the New York State Abandoned Property Law. Attorney Ian R. Cohen submitted an amicus curiae brief opposing the plaintiffs' claims. He argues that the Abandoned Property Law is intended for tangible items, whereas blockchain addresses are always visible to the world; if the original owner was unable to withdraw assets due to a security breach, this constitutes a passive loss of access rather than a voluntary abandonment. (The Block)
According to Drift’s official announcement, the Drift Protocol released its latest recovery update on June 3, 2026. An independent forensic investigation conducted by cybersecurity firm Mandiant has confirmed that the prior attack against Drift was carried out by the North Korean threat group UNC6862, whose tactics closely align with those historically employed by North Korean state-sponsored hacking operations. On the rebuilding front, Drift announced the appointment of Noah Prince—former Engineering Lead of the Helium Protocol—as Protocol Lead, who will spearhead codebase hardening and platform security architecture redesign. Additionally, former members of the Gauntlet team have been brought on board to conduct margin engine reviews, optimize funding rates and market parameters, enhance liquidation mechanisms, and implement continuous risk monitoring. Drift plans to relaunch with “security-first” as its core principle, repositioning itself as Solana’s largest USDT-perpetuals exchange. With support from strategic partners including Tether, Drift will establish a dedicated recovery pool funded by platform revenues to compensate users for losses. Further details regarding the recovery mechanism and timeline will be disclosed progressively.
Galaxy 研究主管 Alex Thorn在 X 平台发文披露,围绕“Noah Doe”试图通过法律程序获得中本聪比特币所有权的遗弃比特币案件迎来重大进展,比特币政策研究所(BPI)已正式申请作为被告介入此案并寻求推动法院驳回全部诉讼。据悉,由律师事务所 White & Case 代理的 BPI 此次不仅申请介入案件,还提交了拟答辩文件、15 项积极抗辩理由并计划提出撤诉动议。 Alex Thorn 透露,BPI 称其具备介入资格,因为该机构长期自托管一部分计划无限期持有的比特币储备,而原告所主张的“长期未动用即构成遗弃”的理论,恰恰可能将类似资产纳入未来诉讼范围。如果本案的法律逻辑最终获得法院支持,未来可能成为剥夺长期自托管用户资产所有权的先例,所以这场诉讼不仅关乎中本聪相关资产,也关系到整个比特币自托管生态的法律基础。
According to Drift’s official announcement, the Drift Protocol released its latest recovery update on June 3, 2026. An independent forensic investigation conducted by cybersecurity firm Mandiant has confirmed that the prior attack against Drift was carried out by the North Korean threat group UNC6862, whose tactics closely align with those historically employed by North Korean state-sponsored hacking operations. On the rebuilding front, Drift announced the appointment of Noah Prince—former Engineering Lead of the Helium Protocol—as Protocol Lead, who will spearhead codebase hardening and platform security architecture redesign. Additionally, former members of the Gauntlet team have been brought on board to conduct margin engine reviews, optimize funding rates and market parameters, enhance liquidation mechanisms, and implement continuous risk monitoring. Drift plans to relaunch with “security-first” as its core principle, repositioning itself as Solana’s largest USDT-perpetuals exchange. With support from strategic partners including Tether, Drift will establish a dedicated recovery pool funded by platform revenues to compensate users for losses. Further details regarding the recovery mechanism and timeline will be disclosed progressively.
According to Sandmark, Pump.fun is alleged to have conducted two rounds of layoffs prior to token unlocking. Documents and recordings show that the first round of layoffs occurred in early April, prior to the token unlocking time originally scheduled to begin in June for relevant employees, meaning at least one former employee may have thereby lost PUMP token allocations worth up to seven figures in USD at current prices. Co-founder Noah Tweedale stated in an internal meeting that the reason for the layoffs was that the company "expanded too fast".
Galaxy's Head of Research posted on X, stating that the court has scheduled a hearing for September 8 at 14:30 to consider requests by Bitcoin Policy to intervene as a defendant and Digital Chamber to join the Noah Doe case as amicus curiae. The case involves Noah Doe's attempt to claim legal ownership of dormant coins, including those held by Satoshi Nakamoto.
Galaxy 研究主管 Alex Thorn在 X 平台发文披露,围绕“Noah Doe”试图通过法律程序获得中本聪比特币所有权的遗弃比特币案件迎来重大进展,比特币政策研究所(BPI)已正式申请作为被告介入此案并寻求推动法院驳回全部诉讼。据悉,由律师事务所 White & Case 代理的 BPI 此次不仅申请介入案件,还提交了拟答辩文件、15 项积极抗辩理由并计划提出撤诉动议。 Alex Thorn 透露,BPI 称其具备介入资格,因为该机构长期自托管一部分计划无限期持有的比特币储备,而原告所主张的“长期未动用即构成遗弃”的理论,恰恰可能将类似资产纳入未来诉讼范围。如果本案的法律逻辑最终获得法院支持,未来可能成为剥夺长期自托管用户资产所有权的先例,所以这场诉讼不仅关乎中本聪相关资产,也关系到整个比特币自托管生态的法律基础。
According to Cointelegraph, Bitcoin address "1KV47" recently completed its first transfer operation in nearly 15 years, moving 30 BTC (approximately $1.88 million) out of the wallet. The address initially received the aforementioned Bitcoin in August 2011. This address is one of 39,069 listed addresses in a New York lawsuit, where plaintiff "Noah Doe" and two Wyoming companies are attempting to claim ownership of these dormant Bitcoins under New York State lost property law. According to data from Galaxy Digital Head of Research Alex Thorn, 31 related addresses have transferred 17,527 BTC in June, a significant increase compared to 4,834 in February. Legal experts point out that address dormancy is not equivalent to abandonment of ownership, and in the absence of proof of private keys, the basis of this lawsuit is "extremely weak".
: According to monitoring by Galaxy's Head of Research, more Noah D`oe-related tokens are moving on-chain. These tokens, which have been dormant for nearly 15 years, are seeing an accelerating pace of on-chain transfers each month from those claimed by Noah Doe.
New York Supreme Court Judge Kathy J. King has signed an order to pause proceedings in a lawsuit seeking ownership claims over 39,069 dormant bitcoin wallets, and has scheduled a hearing for July 14 regarding a key amicus curiae brief.The plaintiffs in the case are an anonymous individual referred to as "Noah Doe" and two shell companies, who are seeking to claim ownership of these wallets under the New York State Abandoned Property Law. Attorney Ian R. Cohen submitted an amicus curiae brief opposing the plaintiffs' claims. He argues that the Abandoned Property Law is intended for tangible items, whereas blockchain addresses are always visible to the world; if the original owner was unable to withdraw assets due to a security breach, this constitutes a passive loss of access rather than a voluntary abandonment. (The Block)