News linked to both this project and an event.
According to CryptoSlate, U.S. Representatives Lance Gooden and Josh Gottheimer jointly introduced the Federal Cryptocurrency Theft Enforcement and Coordination Act, which proposes establishing a Federal Cryptocurrency Theft Task Force within the Department of Justice (DOJ). The task force would comprise representatives from the DOJ, FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and Department of the Treasury (including FinCEN). It would serve as the federal government’s central coordinating body for preventing, investigating, and prosecuting cryptocurrency theft cases, while also providing training and technical guidance to local law enforcement agencies on evidence collection, asset tracing, and victim support. This move follows the DOJ’s April 2025 decision to disband the National Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team (NCET), citing a shift toward “prosecution over regulation.” FBI data shows that cryptocurrency-related complaints reached 181,000 in 2025, with losses exceeding $11 billion. Notably, the bill explicitly excludes cryptocurrency market regulation from the task force’s mandate, and existing criminal statutes remain unchanged. However, critical details—including funding sources, staffing levels, and victim response mechanisms—remain undefined, prompting external concerns about the bill’s practical implementation.
According to CryptoSlate, the White House Council of Economic Advisers recently released a research report stating that banning stablecoin yields offers only minimal protection for bank lending, yet would significantly reduce consumers’ ability to earn returns through digital cash. This conclusion directly undermines the banking industry’s core argument in favor of yield restrictions and provides new policy support for the CLARITY Act. Currently, Treasury Secretary Bessent and SEC Chair Atkins have both publicly endorsed the bill, indicating growing alignment between the executive branch and regulatory agencies. However, the Senate Banking Committee has yet to announce a timeline for reviewing the legislation, and political maneuvering remains the largest uncertainty. Analysts note that if the committee completes its review before the summer recess, the bill’s chances of passage will rise substantially; otherwise, it faces the dual risks of electoral pressures and legislative delays.