News linked to both this project and an event.
According to The Paper, the case of Qian Zhimin, involving over 40 billion yuan in illegal fund-raising and more than 60,000 bitcoins, has seen new progress in China's judicial proceedings. On October 13, the Second Intermediate People's Court of Tianjin Municipality announced that it accepted the case on September 28 concerning an application by the Second Branch of the Tianjin Municipal People's Procuratorate to confiscate the illegal proceeds of criminal suspect Qian Zhimin. The assets targeted for confiscation include 61,896.41552945 bitcoins, 72,745.79502 Bitcoin Cash, 72,745.78555 Bitcoin Gold, 72,745.7845 Bitcoin SV, 3,605,989.9995 Ripple (XRP), 70,081,208.62553222 Dogecoin, as well as cash, jewelry, financial assets, and other items.
Odaily News: On October 13, the Tianjin Second Intermediate People's Court issued an announcement stating that on September 28, the court filed and accepted a case in which the Tianjin People's Procuratorate Second Branch applied for the forfeiture of illegal gains involving criminal suspect Qian Zhimin. The case involves over 40 billion yuan in illegal fundraising and more than 61,800 bitcoins.According to the list of property subject to forfeiture published by the Tianjin Second Intermediate People's Court, the virtual currencies involved also include approximately 72,700 Bitcoin Cash, approximately 72,700 Bitcoin Gold, approximately 72,700 Bitcoin SV, approximately 3.606 million XRP, and approximately 70.0812 million Dogecoin. The aforementioned Dogecoin has been converted by UK judicial authorities and deposited into an interest-bearing account. The property subject to forfeiture also includes cash in US dollars, euros, and pounds sterling, jewelry, as well as bank balances, investment portfolios, and other assets. The Tianjin People's Procuratorate Second Branch holds that Qian Zhimin is suspected of the crime of fundraising fraud, and after fleeing and being wanted for one year has failed to appear in court. The more than 61,800 bitcoins and other property seized in the UK constitute illegal gains and their proceeds, and should be recovered in accordance with the law, with forfeiture imposed after lawful restitution to the affected fundraising participants.
Odaily News BIP-110 has sparked community controversy over its attempt to restrict non-financial data storage on the Bitcoin blockchain. Supporters of this proposal plan to push for the rule change through a User-Activated Soft Fork (UASF), but current miner support is far from meeting the activation requirements. The market is watching whether this controversy will further escalate into a split within Bitcoin's network governance.Blockstream CEO Adam Back criticized the arguments of BIP-110 supporters in a post on the X platform, stating that the claim "Bitcoin supports spam data" is incorrect and noting that all Bitcoin participants dislike network spam. Adam Back pointed out that Bitcoin cannot achieve absolute censorship at the mathematical level, and the BIP-110 proposal itself has numerous flaws that prevent it from functioning effectively, which is why it has not gained network consensus. He emphasized that forcibly pushing rule changes without consensus could ultimately lead to a fork outcome similar to Bitcoin SV (BSV).